Home Home
in this section
 
 
Take Action
  Action Alerts
  Action Packs
  Advocacy Do's and Don'ts
  Ten Ways to Talk to a Legislator
  Community Organizing: Hands Off Our Holiday

Search Our Site:

Scary Beer Ads Campaign Press Coverage

Ad Age.com

COORS UNDER FIRE FOR PG-13 MOVIE TIE-INS
Twin Beer Babes Hawk Brew and Appear in Teen Flick
By Kate MacArthur

November 03, 2003

CHICAGO (AdAge.com) -- Adolph Coors Co. is under fire from a youth anti-alcohol group for its involvement in a Halloween movie the group said directly targets teens.

Just a month after alcohol marketers agreed to advertise only in media that reached an audience consisting of at least 70% adults, the Marin Institute has accused Coors of defying those guidelines by promoting its tie-in with Miramax's Scary Movie 3. What's scary to Marin executives about the film, produced by Miramax sub-label Destination Films, is its PG-13 rating from the Motion Picture Association of America. The PG-13 rating states, "Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13."

Coors twins in movie
Coors is not only advertising around Scary Movie 3, but has its Coors twins appearing in the film. The company claims it thought the film would be accessible only to older viewers: "It was a surprise to us that PG-13 rating came out," said a Coors spokeswoman. She added that the brewer and Miramax expected the film to receive an R rating as the first two Scary Movie properties had received.

"We don't want to be targeting minors," she said.

Coors spent an estimated $3 million to $8 million, including TV ads using scenes from the film and in-store displays, to promote the role its busty and ubiquitous spokes-twins had in the movie. In its first week, the film grossed $49 million. The twins' cameo in a party scene in the horror-film parody is part of a three-year, 15-film product-placement deal Coors has with the Walt Disney Co.-owned Miramax.

"Once a film is rated, it is technically done," said Lori Sale, executive vice president of worldwide promotions for Miramax. "A brand doesn't retain the rights to pull that placement out because they're not happy with the rating a film subsequently gets."

Ads broke before rating
"If Coors wanted to be responsible, they would have pulled the promotional ads when they learned it was rated PG-13," said Laurie Lieber, a media advocate for the Marin Institute. Coors began promoting the film a month before it opened with ads stating the film had not yet been rated. By the time the film had received its rating, TV ads and in-store displays promoting the film had already gone into distribution.

Ms. Sale defended Coors, which sent the studio to sensitivity training and "asked all the right questions" about the audience compositions for the first two films, which were both more than 70% over 21 years old.

The Coors spokeswoman said the company discontinued the TV spots after Marin complained. "We don't want misperceptions that we are looking to appeal to minors, so we discontinued the ads," she said. But Ms. Sale said Coors' planned media schedule was set to end when the film opened.

'An objectionable ad'
"What I see is an objectionable ad that ran its course, but when [Coors] got into trouble, they admit the ad was inappropriate and they claim they're not going to use it anymore, and that self-regulation is working," Ms. Lieber said.

Mary Engle, associate director of advertising practices for the Federal Trade Commission, sees this case as a "perfect thing" to bring before the Advertising Pledge Program of the Better Business Bureau for resolution. Coors is the only national beer marketer to use this third-party review program. Three complaints have been reviewed by the program, which found one campaign in violation of Coors' pledge standards.

The FTC recommends that every company use such a neutral party to track and publicize compliance since the government only steps in when asked to by Congress or when it observes red flags.

Looking for a pattern
"You look more for a pattern of practice" of consistently targeting underage drinking, Ms. Engle said. "The problem with looking at each individual show is that you can't show in advance what the individual audience will be."

"There is enough to raise a question of pattern," a Marin spokesman said. "The fact that Coors is now already promoting the fact that they're in Scary Movie 4 indicates the intent to continue co-promoting a highly recognized youth brand."

Campaign Partner Organizations:
 
Friday Night Live
Youth Leadership Institute
 

The Alcohol Industry spent $3 Billion on Advertising and Promotion in 2001
Signup:
Action Alerts
Alcohol News - Weekly
(See samples)